Abstract
BackgroundClinical scales to detect large vessel occlusion (LVO) may help to determine the optimal transport destination for patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The clinical benefit associated with improved diagnostic accuracy of these scales has not been quantified.MethodsWe used a previously reported conditional model to estimate the probability of good outcome (modified Rankin scale sore ≤2) for patients with AIS and unknown vessel status occurring in regions with greater proximity to a primary than to a comprehensive stroke center. Optimal rapid arterial occlusion evaluation (RACE) scale cutoff scores were calculated based on time-dependent effect-size estimates from recent randomized controlled trials. Probabilities of good outcome were compared between a triage strategy based on these cutoffs and a strategy based on a hypothetical perfect LVO detection tool with 100% diagnostic accuracy.ResultsIn our model, the additional benefit of a perfect LVO detection tool as compared to optimal transport-time dependent RACE cutoff scores ranges from 0 to 5%. It is largest for patients with medium stroke symptom severity (RACE score 5) and in geographic environments with longer transfer time between the primary and comprehensive stroke center.ConclusionBased on a probabilistic conditional model, the results of our simulation indicate that more accurate prehospital clinical LVO detections scales may be associated with only modest improvements in the expected probability of good outcome for patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke and unknown vessel status.
Highlights
Clinical scales to detect large vessel occlusion (LVO) may help to determine the optimal transport destination for patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke (AIS)
The effect is most noticeable for medium severity strokes (RACE score 5), geographic environments with longer transfer time between hospitals, and in scenarios in which treatment time windows would allow neither thrombolysis at the comprehensive stroke center (CSC) under the mothership approach nor secondary transfer for endovascular therapy (EVT) under the drip and ship approach (Fig. 1b; Additional file 1, Panels A and B)
The effect is slightly larger if the hypothetical perfect LVO detection tool is compared with a strategy based on a fixed rapid arterial occlusion evaluation (RACE) cutoff score ≥ 5
Summary
Clinical scales to detect large vessel occlusion (LVO) may help to determine the optimal transport destination for patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The clinical benefit associated with improved diagnostic accuracy of these scales has not been quantified. Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) have better outcomes if they receive endovascular therapy (EVT) in addition to thrombolysis. [1] It is currently not known whether patients with suspected AIS should be transported directly to an EVT-capable comprehensive stroke center (CSC) even if that would mean bypassing a closer non-EVT-capable. LVO detection scales has not been examined. We quantify the additional benefit of a hypothetical LVO detection tool with 100% accuracy over currently existing scales exemplified by the rapid arterial occlusion evaluation (RACE) scale. We quantify the additional benefit of a hypothetical LVO detection tool with 100% accuracy over currently existing scales exemplified by the rapid arterial occlusion evaluation (RACE) scale. [6]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.