Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is recognized as being a life-threatening event. Both microvascular obstruction (MVO) and intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) have been recognized as poor prognostic factors in myocardial infarct (MI) since they adversely affect left ventricular remodeling. MVO refers to small vessels changes that prevent adequate tissue perfusion despite revascularization whereas IMH is a severe form of MVO. A limited number of studies have demonstrated the segmental intervention time and the clinical factors in the presence of MVO and IMH. Therefore, we aimed in this study to determine the correlations of the intervention-associated and clinical indexes with malignant cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) signs in patients with AMI.Sixty-three patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) within 12 hours were included in this study. A 3.0-T CMR scan was prescribed, and the subsequent image analysis was conducted by researchers blinded to the clinical index results. Late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and T2∗ sequences were mainly used for MVO and IMH identification and quantification.Patients exhibiting both MVO and IMH had the highest level of LGE (P < .001) and were significantly more frequently assigned to a pre-PPCI thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow class of 0 (n=25, 89.3%). The MVO size correlated positively with the IMH size (r = 0.81, P < .01). A pre-PPCI TIMI flow class of 0 was found to reliably predict the presence of IMH (P < .001). Patients who received the intervention 4 to 6 hours after MI onset were more likely to exhibit MVO and IMH, although this trend was not statistically significant.We showed in our study that both MVO and IMH correlated with the degree of AMI and the pre-PPCI coronary flow, and both tended to occur more frequently in cases involving an interval of 4 to 6 hours between the onset of MI and the intervention. CMR is a reliable method for assessing MVO and IMH and its imaging features following gadolinium administration are characteristic. These findings stress the importance of using CMR in evaluating and improving the outcome of the medical management.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call