Abstract
Objective: To compare the clinical information between the patients receiving VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) anatomic segmentectomy and open anatomic segmentectomy in the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer and solitary pulmonary nodules. Methods: The clinical records of 10 patients receiving VATS anatomical segmentectomy and 7 patients receiving open anatomic segmentectomy between January 2009 and June 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The maximum diameter of the lung lesion, number of lymph node groups dissected, number of lymph nodes dissected, duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay after surgery and post-operative complications between the two operation groups were compared. Results: The length of hospital stay after surgery was significantly shortened in VATS anatomical segmentectomy group as compared with that in the open anatomic segmentectomy group (4.4±1.1 vs 6.6±1.0 d, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, maximum diameter of the lung lesion, number of lymph node groups dissected, and the number of lymph nodes dissected between the two groups. No postoperative complications were observed in the two groups. Conclusion: VATS anatomic segmentectomy can be safely conducted in patients with early stage NSCLC or solitary pulmonary nodules, and this operative approach should be recommended in clinical practice. DOI:10.3781/j.issn.1000-7431.2013.06.010
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.