Abstract
Despite global efforts to control tuberculosis (TB) the estimated number of people who developed TB worldwide increased to an all-time record of more than 10 million in 2015. The goal of the World Health Organization (WHO) to reduce the global incidence of TB to less than 100 cases per million by 2035, cannot be reached unless TB prevention is markedly improved. There is a need for an improved vaccine that better protects individuals who are exposed to Mycobacterium tuberculosis from infection and active disease compared to the current M. bovis Bacille Calmette Guérin (BCG) vaccine. In the absence of such a vaccine, prevention relies on infection control measures and preventive chemotherapy for people with latent infection with M. tuberculosis (LTBI), who have the highest risk of progression to active TB. During the past decade, interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) have increasingly replaced the tuberculin skin test as screening tools for the diagnosis of LTBI in countries with a low incidence of TB. Despite recent WHO guidelines on the management of LTBI, the definition of groups at risk for TB remains controversial, and the role of IGRAs for TB prevention in low-incidence countries remains uncertain. We reviewed the scientific literature and provide recommendations for the use of IGRAs for LTBI diagnosis in low-incidence countries. These recommendations are based on the number of patients needing treatment in order to prevent one case of TB. As the positive predictive value of IGRAs for the development of TB is sub-optimal, research must focus on the identification of alternative biomarkers that offer better predictive ability in order to substantially reduce the number needing treatment while improving the prevention of TB and improving the effectiveness of targeted preventive chemotherapy.
Highlights
Tuberculosis (TB) is an airborne infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis [1]
The great majority of people infected with M. tuberculosis do not develop active disease it is estimated that one third of the worlds population is infected with M. tuberculosis. [2]
As the risk for tuberculosis depends on host susceptibility and pathogen exposure, the definition of risk groups for targeted latent infection with M. tuberculosis (LTBI) screening varies substantially over time and is dependent on the geographic region
Summary
Tuberculosis (TB) is an airborne infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis [1]. The TST has technical and operational disadvantages which include cross-reactivity to M. bovis or non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) after BCG vaccination or NTM infection, requirement of a second visit 48 to 72 hours after application of the skin test, operator variability in test reading, low sensitivity in immunocompromised patients, and a booster effect that can be misinterpreted as a recent conversion This has led to the development of interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) as ex-vivo alternatives. Skin-test formats have been further developed that make use of ESAT-6 and CFP-10 as in vivo stimuli [29,30,31,32] As expected, this leads to an increase in specificity compared to the conventional TST.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.