Abstract

Objective To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using flexible titanium intramedullary nailing for the treatment of upper supracondylar fractures or the distal humeral metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures in children.Methods Between 2009 and 2011,5 supracondylar humeral fractures and 5 metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures of the distal humerus underwent this procedure at our institution.In 4 patients,the fracture line was oblique,and in 6 patients,the fracture line was transverse.Results All these patients were followed up at 1、3、6、12 months (ranged from 2 to 21 months).All of the cases have healed well Baumann's angle (average 71.1°,64°~78°) 、and the lateral humeral- capitellar angle(average 37.5°,35°~40°) were all within normal range at the latest follow-up.All patients achieved free range of movement of the affected elbow.No visible malpositions,pseudo- arthrosis or nerve lesions were observed.Conclusions Using flexible titanium intramedullary nailing technique may get optimal outcomes for children with upper supracondylar humeral fractures or the distal humeral metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures.These should be differentiated from the more common supracondvlar humerus fracture. Key words: Humeral fractures; Elastic stable intramedullary nailing; Elbow joint; Child

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.