Abstract

Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of C3–C6 laminoplasty and C3–C6 laminoplasty with C7 dome-like laminectomy for the treatment of patients with stenosis at the C6–7 level. Methods Forty-nine patients who underwent C3–C6 laminoplasty and 39 patients who underwent C7 dome-like laminectomy were selected based on strict criteria, including the presence of stenosis grade 2 at the C6–7 level preoperatively. The clinical and radiologic outcomes were compared at admission and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Results The baseline clinical characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score improved more significantly in the C7 dome-like laminectomy group (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in neck pain between the two groups (p = 0.15). The spinal cord diameter at the C6–7 level was significantly increased in the dome-like laminectomy group (p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the cross-sectional area of the paraspinal muscles, the cervical lordotic angle between C2–C7 and the cervical range of motion between the two groups (p = 0.33, 0.46, and 0.41, respectively). Neurological deterioration was not observed in C7 dome-like laminectomy group while 4 patients developed neurological deterioration in C3–C6 laminoplasty group. Conclusions C7 dome-like laminectomy can be a surgical option for patients with stenosis grade 2 at the C6–7 level. It is possible to obtain adequate spinal cord decompression while obtaining good clinical and radiologic outcomes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.