Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundThe aim of this systematic review is to determine if robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) results in improved clinical and radiological outcomes, and to elucidate the breadth and depth of studies conducted on this topic. MethodsA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review was conducted using 4 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science) to identify all clinical studies that investigate clinical or radiological outcomes using RATKA. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist for cohort studies was employed for critical appraisal and evaluation of all 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria. ResultsAll studies reviewed determined that knee arthroplasty improved clinical outcomes. Twelve studies found statistically better clinical outcomes with RATKA compared with conventional TKA, whereas 9 studies found no difference. One study did not assess clinical outcomes. When assessing radiological outcomes, 14 studies reported that RATKA resulted in more consistent and accurate postoperative mechanical alignment, whereas 2 studies reported no difference. Six studies did not assess radiological outcomes. ConclusionAlthough knee arthroplasty is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic operations, the level of patient satisfaction varies. The meta-analyses conducted in our systematic review shows that RATKA results in greater improvements in postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities scores compared to conventional TKA. Furthermore, it shows that RATKA results in more accurate postoperative alignment of prostheses. These together can explain the improved postoperative outcomes. More randomized controlled trials must be conducted before this technique is integrated into routine clinical practice.