Abstract
After more than a decade of experience with off-pump coronary bypass surgery, still no consensus exists concerning its benefit on clinical outcome compared to the on-pump technique. In this 12-month follow-up, we compare off-pump and on-pump surgery on the appearance of graft patency, myocardial function, and clinical outcome. One hundred twenty patients were randomized to off-pump or on-pump coronary surgery. Angiography was performed intraoperatively, at 3 and 12 months. Global myocardial function was estimated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, as well as functional class and stress testing. After 12 months internal mammary artery patency was 94% in the off-pump group and 96% in the on-pump group. Vein graft patency was 80% and 87%, respectively. No statistically significant difference between the two groups existed. There were no differences in exercise capacity improvement and attenuation of symptoms between the groups. At 12-months follow-up, off-pump coronary bypass surgery provided the same angiographic graft patency as the on-pump technique. Improvement in functional class and exercise capacity was the same in both groups.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
