Abstract
To characterize clinical and radiologic features of patients with central pontine myelinolysis (CPM) and identify variables that predict outcome. We retrospectively studied patients diagnosed as having CPM identified by a search of Mayo Clinic medical records from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2010. Diagnosis was made by clinical and radiologic features. Favorable outcome was defined by a modified Rankin Scale score of 2 or lower. Volume of signal abnormality on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was quantified by a neuroradiologist blinded to outcomes. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to assess association between volume of signal abnormality and outcomes at discharge and last follow-up. Of 24 patients, 14 (58%) had only CPM, and 10 (42%) had extrapontine involvement. Hyponatremia was documented in 18 patients (75%), with median sodium nadir of 114 mmol/L. Eighteen patients (75%) had alcoholism, and malnutrition was documented in 12 (50%). Presenting symptoms included encephalopathy (n=18 [75%]), ataxia (n=11 [46%]), dysarthria (n=7 [29%]), eye movement abnormalities (n=6 [25%]), and seizures (n=5 [21%]). Favorable outcome was seen in 15 patients (63%) at last follow-up. Findings on initial brain MRI were normal in 5 patients, but all MRI scans were abnormal with serial imaging. The volume of radiologic signal abnormality was not associated with outcome at discharge or last follow-up (P=.67 and P=.37, respectively). Clinical outcome in patients with CPM is not predicted by the volume of radiologic T2 signal abnormality on MRI or the severity of hyponatremia. Serial brain imaging is of value because a substantial proportion of patients have normal findings on initial MRI.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.