Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes after Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Two Specialized Surgical Tables.

Abstract

BackgroundSpecialized tables for direct anterior (DA) approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) have required an unscrubbed assistant for manipulation of the operative limb. A novel surgical table attachment designed for the DA approach is fully surgeon controlled and partially automated. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes in patients who underwent THA through a DA approach with an assistant-controlled vs the surgeon-controlled (SC) table.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of 343 patients who underwent primary THA between January 2017 and October 2017. Two cohorts were established based on the surgical table used. Surgical and clinical data included the surgical time, length of stay, presence of pain (groin, hip, or thigh pain) at latest follow-up, and revision for any reason. Immediate postoperative radiographs were compared with latest follow-up radiographs to assess for leg length discrepancy, stem alignment, and stem subsidence.ResultsOne hundred sixty-seven (48.7%) cases were performed using the assistant-controlled table, and 176 (51.3%) cases were performed using the SC table. The surgical time was significantly greater for surgeries using the SC table (70.2 minutes vs 66.1 minutes, P < .001). Neither group experienced any intraoperative fractures or postoperative dislocations. There were no significant differences in any other clinical or radiographic outcomes.ConclusionsAlthough the surgical time with the self-controlled table was longer by approximately 4 minutes, this discrepancy disappeared with progression through the learning curve. In our experience, the SC table allows for greater autonomy for the operating surgeon and eliminates the need for a full-time employee in the operating room workflow.