CLINICAL AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GLANDULAR ODONTOGENIC CYST: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the determinant clinical and histologic aspects in the establishment of the diagnosis of the glandular odontogenic cyst (GOC).Study Design: A cross-sectional study was performed in 2 oral pathology services. All slides of GOCs were reviewed and clinical data were obtained from the patient records. The determination of the diagnosis followed predetermined microscopic parameters according to the World Health Organization. Statistical analysis was performed in order to identify the predictive parameters for the diagnosis of GOC. Results: From the 9 patient cases of GOCs, 55.5% were male, with a mean age of 50.6 years, and 66.6% were located in the mandible. All cases presented with intraepithelial microcysts or duct-like spaces, clear or vacuolated cells, variable thickness of the cyst lining, and papillary projections into the lumen. Multiple compartments, surface eosinophilic cuboidal cells, and epithelial spheres or plaque-like thickenings were observed in 8 (88%) cases. Apocrine snouting of hobnail cells were present in 6 (66%), mucous goblet cells in 3 (33.3%), and cilia in only 1 (11%). Conclusion: The association between the predictive clinical and histopathological aspects for the diagnosis of this rare lesion is fundamental, since GOC has the potential to mimic other potentially more aggressive lesions. Objective: To analyze the determinant clinical and histologic aspects in the establishment of the diagnosis of the glandular odontogenic cyst (GOC).Study Design: A cross-sectional study was performed in 2 oral pathology services. All slides of GOCs were reviewed and clinical data were obtained from the patient records. The determination of the diagnosis followed predetermined microscopic parameters according to the World Health Organization. Statistical analysis was performed in order to identify the predictive parameters for the diagnosis of GOC. Results: From the 9 patient cases of GOCs, 55.5% were male, with a mean age of 50.6 years, and 66.6% were located in the mandible. All cases presented with intraepithelial microcysts or duct-like spaces, clear or vacuolated cells, variable thickness of the cyst lining, and papillary projections into the lumen. Multiple compartments, surface eosinophilic cuboidal cells, and epithelial spheres or plaque-like thickenings were observed in 8 (88%) cases. Apocrine snouting of hobnail cells were present in 6 (66%), mucous goblet cells in 3 (33.3%), and cilia in only 1 (11%). Conclusion: The association between the predictive clinical and histopathological aspects for the diagnosis of this rare lesion is fundamental, since GOC has the potential to mimic other potentially more aggressive lesions.