Abstract
BackgroundRivaroxaban, a fixed-dose oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, does not require continuous monitoring and thus reduces the hospital stay and economic burden in low-risk pulmonary embolism (LRPE) patients. Study Question: What is the effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus the standard of care (SOC; low-molecular-weight heparin, unfractionated heparin, warfarin) among LRPE patients in the Veterans Health Administration?Study DesignAdult patients with continuous health plan enrollment for ≥12 months pre- and 3 months post-inpatient PE diagnosis (index date=discharge date) between October 1, 2011–June 30, 2015 and an anticoagulant claim during the index hospitalization were included.Measures and OutcomesPatients scoring 0 points on the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Stratification Index were considered low-risk and were stratified into SOC and rivaroxaban cohorts. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare hospital-acquired complications (HACs), PE-related outcomes (recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and death), and healthcare utilization and costs between the rivaroxaban and SOC cohorts.ResultsAmong 6746 PE patients, 1918 were low-risk; of these, 73 were prescribed rivaroxaban, 1546 were prescribed SOC, and 299 were prescribed other anticoagulants during the index hospitalization. After 1:3 PSM, 64 rivaroxaban and 192 SOC patients were included. During the index hospitalization, rivaroxaban users (versus SOC) had similar inpatient length of stay (LOS; 7.0 vs 6.7 days, standardized difference [STD]=1.8) but fewer HACs (4.7% vs 10.4%; STD: 21.7). In the 90-day post-discharge period, PE-related outcome rates were similar between the cohorts (all p>0.05). However, rivaroxaban users had fewer outpatient (15.9 vs 20.4; p=0.0002) visits per patient as well as lower inpatient ($765 vs $2,655; p<0.0001), pharmacy ($711 vs $1,086; p=0.0033), and total costs ($6,270 vs $9,671; p=0.0027).ConclusionsLRPE patients prescribed rivaroxaban had similar index LOS and PE-related outcomes, but fewer HACs, and lower total costs than those prescribed SOC.
Highlights
Rivaroxaban users had similar inpatient length of stay (LOS; 7.0 vs 6.7 days, standardized difference [STD]=1.8) but fewer hospital-acquired complications (HACs) (4.7% vs 10.4%; STD: 21.7)
After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 6746 Pulmonary embolism (PE) patients were included in the study, among which 1918 (28.4%) were stratified as low-risk pulmonary embolism (LRPE) patients
The rivaroxaban cohort had a shorter inpatient length of stay (LOS; 6.2 vs 8.2, STD:12.4), lower proportion of patients with HACs (5.5% vs. 10.0%, STD: 17.0) and higher proportion of patients with BNP measured during their index hospitalization (38.4% vs 25.3%, STD: 28.2; Table 1)
Summary
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common form of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and is defined as a mechanical obstruction in the pulmonary artery or its branches with a blood clot, tumor, air, or fat.[1,2] Among patients with vascular disease, PE is the third most common cardiovascular event behind myocardial infarction and stroke, with an annual rate of 112 cases per 100 000 that rises with age.[2,3] The mortality rate in PE patients is estimated to be 10% at 1-3 months, with the highest mortality occurring in those presenting with hypotension and evidence of right ventricular dysfunction.[4,5,6] In the United States, PE causes 100 000 deaths annually; in Europe, PE-related deaths were estimated at 300 000 deaths annually. Rivaroxaban, a fixed-dose oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, does not require continuous monitoring and reduces the hospital stay and economic burden in low-risk pulmonary embolism (LRPE) patients. Study Question: What is the effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus the standard of care (SOC; low-molecular-weight heparin, unfractionated heparin, warfarin) among LRPE patients in the Veterans Health Administration?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.