Clinical analysis of 32 cases of facial nerve schwannomas

Abstract

Objective:To elucidate the clinical characteristics, surgical strategy, facial nerve repair methods and outcomes of facial nerve schwannomas（FNS）. Methods:The clinical data of patients with FNS treated between January 2010 and December 2018 at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were retrospectively collected, including the sidedness of FNS, clinical manifestations, imaging data, the extent of tumor, clinical management, preoperative and postoperative facial nerve function. Results:The major clinical manifestations of the 32 patients with FNS were facial palsy（27, 84.4%）, hearing loss（27, 84.4%）, tinnitus（22, 68.8%）, ear mass（15, 46.9%）, and stuffy feeling in the ear（13, 40.6%） respectively. Thirty patients were preoperatively diagnosed with FNS and 2 patients were misdiagnosed. 31 patients underwent resection of FNS, except one patient who was selected for long-term follow-up observation. The choice of surgical approach was based on the location, extent and auditory function of the FNS involved as well as the patient's wishes. The surgical approach was decided based on the location and extent of the tumor: 9 patients were operated via the inferior temporal fossa type A（Fisch A） approach; 8 patients were operated via the mastoid approach; 7 patients were operated via the enlarged mastoid approach; 3 patients were operated via the combined mastoid-cranial middle fossa approach; 1 patient was operated via the cranial middle fossa approach; 3 patients were operated via the combined Fisch A-cranial middle fossa approach. 28 patients（87.5%） had FNS with multiple segments of facial nerve involved. The most involved segment was the vertical segment of the facial nerve（26, 81.3%）. 15 patients underwent facial nerve repair simultaneously, including 7 cases of auricular nerve-facial nerve graft and 8 cases of facial nerve-sublingual nerve anastomosis. 4 cases had improved facial nerve function after auricular nerve-facial nerve graft and 2 cases had improved function after facial nerve-sublingual nerve anastomosis. Among patients who underwent facial nerve repair,the best outcome was H-B Ⅲ. Conclusion:The patients with FNS mainly presented with facial palsy and hearing loss. Temporal bone CT and cranial MR plain & enhanced scan served well to confirm the diagnosis. The improvement rate of postoperative facial nerve function was significantly higher in patients who underwent nerve repair than in those who did not. Hence, facial nerve repair should be considered. Compared with facial nerve-sublingual nerve anastomosis, auricular major nerve-facial nerve graft might be a better choice for improving postoperative facial nerve function.