Abstract

PurposeThe present study aims to assess the agreement between clinical and pathological diagnosis in conjunctival tumours in a specialist ocular oncology unit. Methodsretrospective study of consecutive patients with conjunctival tumours diagnosed at the Ocular Oncology Unit of the University Hospital of Valladolid was performed from 1992 to 2017. Tumours were classified according to their origin (epithelial, melanocytic, lymphoid and others) and degree of malignancy (benign, premalignant, malignant). A biopsy was performed in cases of symptomatic or growing lesions. Cohen´s kappa (κ) statistics was used as an indicator of agreement between clinical and pathological diagnosis. ResultsOf 462 consecutive patients, a biopsy was required in 195 (42.2%). The agreement with the pathological diagnosis was successful in 154 (79.0%) cases. Analysis according to the grade of malignancy showed the lowest rate of agreement among benign (n = 83; 91.6%) and premalignant (n = 62; 90.3%) lesions, with a total agreement in malignant lesions (n = 50; 100%); the Cohen´s kappa coefficient (κ) was 0.90. The highest rates of concordance were found in epithelial, melanocytic and soft tissue lesions with κ values of 1, 0.8 and 1 respectively. The worst rate of concordance was found in lymphoid lesions with a κ value of 0.3. ConclusionMost of the conjunctival tumours were correctly identified clinically; benign and malignant lesions showed the highest rate of accuracy; however, premalignant tumours can hide micro-invasive diseases that can go unnoticed on clinical examination. The biopsy is essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.