Clindamycin Resistance Detection among MRSA at a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-sectional Study

Abstract

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance is on the rise, posing a global threat to the success of modern surgical procedures. A common and notorious superbug causing community and hospital-acquired infections is Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Its potential for easy and rapid spread leads to increased mortality in hospitals. Clindamycin, a relatively inexpensive and effective drug, is empirically prescribed for the treatment of MRSA infections. Due to the risk of misidentifying clindamycin resistance as susceptibility, leading to treatment failure, its judicious use after D-test is advocated. Aim: To isolate Staphylococcus aureus (S.aureus) from various clinical specimens and to identify MRSA using cefoxitin disc (30 μg), further determining the incidence of inducible clindamycin resistance among MRSA by the disc diffusion method (D-test). Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, Government Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College Hospital (GMKMCH), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India, from June 2023 to August 2023. Study was conducted using 185 S.aureus isolates collected from samples received from patients of all genders treated at the present study hospital. Various clinical samples such as pus, sputum, blood, urine and fluids collected from patients treated at the study Institute Salem during the study period were included. A cefoxitin disc (30 μg) was used to detect MRSA among the 185 S.aureus isolates by disc diffusion method as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, which were further tested for clindamycin resistance using clindamycin (2 μg) with erythromycin (15 μg) discs by the D-test. The data of the study were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0. Further descriptive statistics and a chi-square test with a level of significance, p-value ≤0.005 (statistically significant), were used. Results: Among 185 S.aureus isolates, 130 (70.27%) were Methicillin-sensitive S.aureus (MSSA) and 55 (29.7%) were MRSA. Inducible clindamycin resistance was observed in 22 (40%) isolates, while 17 (30.9%) isolates showed constitutive resistance, 9 (16.36%) showed the MS phenotype, and the remaining 7 (12.72%) showed the susceptible phenotype. Among the clindamycin resistance patterns in MRSA, inducible clindamycin resistance was reported predominantly. Conclusion: The majority of S.aureus was isolated from pus samples, highlighting its importance as a pyogenic microorganism. The current study records a high rate of MRSA resistance among S.aureus isolates. The present study reports a higher rate of inducible clindamycin resistance among MRSA isolates when compared to other phenotypes of clindamycin resistance. Therefore, routine D-testing must be implemented to identify inducible resistance to clindamycin in MRSA to avoid treatment failure.