Abstract

Climate change is altering the water cycle globally, increasing the frequency and magnitude of floods and droughts. An outstanding question is whether biodiversity responses to hydrological disturbance depend on background climatic context – and if so, which contexts increase vulnerability to disturbance. Answering this question requires comparison of organismal responses across environmental gradients. However, opportunities to track disturbed communities against an undisturbed baseline remain rare. Here we gathered a global dataset capturing responses of aquatic invertebrate communities to river drying, which includes 112 sites spanning a gradient of climatic aridity. We measured the effects of river drying on taxonomic richness and temporal β‐diversity (turnover and nestedness components). We also measured the relative abundance of aquatic invertebrates with strategies that confer resilience (or resistance) to drying. Contrary to our expectations, we found that taxonomic richness recovered from drying similarly across the aridity gradient. The turnover component of β‐diversity (i.e. species replacements over time) largely accounted for differences in community composition before versus after drying. However, increasing aridity was associated with greater nestedness‐driven compositional changes at intermittent sites – that is, after drying communities became subsets of those before drying. These results show that climatic context can explain variation in community responses to the same hydrological disturbance (drying), and suggest that increased aridity will constrain biodiversity responses at regional scales. Further consideration of the climatic context in hydroecological research may help improve predictions of the local impacts of hydrological disturbance by identifying climate regions where communities are more (or less) sensitive to extremes, including river drying events.

Highlights

  • Disturbance events such as droughts, floods, fires and hurricanes structure biological communities at local to regional scales (Hutchinson 1961, Chesson 2000, Woodward et al 2016, Tonkin et al 2017)

  • These results show that climatic context can explain variation in community responses to the same hydrological disturbance, and suggest that increased aridity will constrain biodiversity responses at regional scales

  • Considering climate is a global determinant of species richness (Hawkins et al 2003), and influences the selection of resilience versus resistance strategists (Buoro and Carlson 2014), we propose that it may explain variation in how communities respond to river drying

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Disturbance events such as droughts, floods, fires and hurricanes structure biological communities at local to regional scales (Hutchinson 1961, Chesson 2000, Woodward et al 2016, Tonkin et al 2017). Post-disturbance states can be difficult to predict because the rates and trajectories of community recovery are often context dependent (Franklin et al 2016, Leigh et al 2016, Datry et al 2017). Climate (mean annual temperature and precipitation) can influence forest recovery rates following disturbance (Anderson-Teixeira et al 2013), and affect the mechanical vulnerability of coral reefs to hydrodynamic action via shifts in species dominance (Madin et al 2008). Climate could influence community responses to disturbance, for instance by selecting for resilience and resistance strategies related to dispersal in space versus ‘in time’ (Buoro and Carlson 2014). While the issue of climate-dependent biodiversity responses to disturbance is relevant to many ecosystems, it is timely in the context of river drying, as overallocation of water resources and climatic droughts continue to induce flow regime shifts

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call