Abstract

Aspects of operational modeling for climate, weather, and space weather forecasts are contrasted, with a particular focus on the somewhat conflicting demands of “operational stability” versus “dynamic development” of the involved models. Some common key elements are identified, indicating potential for fruitful exchange across communities. Operational model development is compelling, driven by factors that broadly fall into four categories: model skill, basic physics, advances in computer architecture, and new aspects to be covered, from costumer needs over physics to observational data. Evaluation of model skill as part of the operational chain goes beyond an automated skill score. Permanent interaction between “pure research” and “operational forecast” people is beneficial to both sides. This includes joint model development projects, although ultimate responsibility for the operational code remains with the forecast provider. The pace of model development reflects operational lead times. The points are illustrated with selected examples, many of which reflect the author’s background and personal contacts, notably with the Swiss Weather Service and the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany. In view of current and future challenges, large collaborations covering a range of expertise are a must − within and across climate, weather, and space weather. To profit from and cope with the rapid progress of computer architectures, supercompute centers must form part of the team.

Highlights

  • Model development in the context of an operational chain or forecast service implies that one has to deal with the somewhat conflicting demands of “operational stability” versus “dynamic development”

  • The specifications arise from the desire to be able to compare and re-use the model data submitted to International Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and are defined by working groups from the climate modeling community as such

  • Operational space weather providers include consortia (e. g., the teams participating in the ESA Space Situational Awareness (SSA) Programme’s Space Weather Service Network, http://swe.ssa.esa.int/) and organizations engaged in numerical weather prediction (NWP) (e.g., the space weather prediction (SWP) Center (SWPC), of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, http://www.swpc. noaa.gov)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Model development in the context of an operational chain or forecast service implies that one has to deal with the somewhat conflicting demands of “operational stability” versus “dynamic development”. Model development is compelling for a number of reasons, to be detailed later Such “dynamic development” typically breaks the aforementioned compliance with specifications, which has to be re-established to regain “operational stability”. Differences among the communities include the envisaged lead time, from minutes.

Folini
Operational predictions and development in different communities
Objectives
Modeling aspects
Model development
Operational modeling and development À synthesis across communities
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call