Abstract

Abstract. With human-induced climate change leading to amplified warming in high latitudes, mitigation alone is unlikely to be rapid enough to prevent significant, even irreversible, impacts. Model simulations in which solar insolation was arbitrarily reduced poleward of 51, 61, or 71° latitude in one or both hemispheres not only cooled those regions, but also drew energy from lower latitudes, exerting a cooling influence over much of the particular hemisphere in which the reduction was imposed. The simulations, conducted using the National Center for Atmospheric Research's CAM3.1 atmospheric model coupled to a slab ocean, indicated that high-latitude reductions in absorbed solar radiation have a significantly larger cooling influence than solar reductions of equivalent magnitude spread evenly over the Earth. This amplified influence occurred primarily because concentrated high-latitude reductions in solar radiation led to increased sea ice fraction and surface albedo, thereby amplifying the energy deficit at the top of the atmosphere as compared to the response for an equivalent reduction in solar radiation spread evenly over the globe. Reductions in incoming solar radiation in one polar region (either north or south) resulted in increased poleward energy transport during that hemisphere's cold season and shifted the Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) away from that pole, whereas comparable solar reductions in both polar regions resulted in increased poleward energy transport, but tended to leave the ITCZ approximately in place. Together, these results suggest that, until emissions reductions are sufficient to limit the warming influence of increasing greenhouse gas concentrations, polar reductions in solar radiation, if they could be efficiently and effectively implemented, warrant further research as an approach to moderating the early stages of both high-latitude and global warming.

Highlights

  • Increases in the atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other radiaTtivheley aCctrivyeossupbshtaencrees have initiated changes in the global climate that are projected to become substantially larger in the future (IPCC, 2007a; NRC, 2010)

  • In the Arctic, the amplified temperature increase in high latitudes is accelerating the loss of land and sea ice (ACIA, 2004; AMAP, 2011), which is contributing to sea level rise around the world (IPCC, 2007a; Meier et al, 2007)

  • Robock et al (2008) found that, normalized by mass, their global injection had an effectiveness about 60 % greater than for their polar injection; had the high latitude injections been mainly for the 4 months of peak solar radiation in the Arctic, the relative effectiveness might well be closer to the results found in this study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Increases in the atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other radiaTtivheley aCctrivyeossupbshtaencrees have initiated changes in the global climate that are projected to become substantially larger in the future (IPCC, 2007a; NRC, 2010). Initial suggestions for counter-balancing the warming influences of greenhouse gases were made in the 1960s (PSAC, 1965; Budyko, 1969, 1974) and received significant attention beginning in the 1990s (NAS, 1992; Leemans et al, 1995; Flannery et al, 1997; Keith, 2000; Schneider, 2001) These early proposals, were not followed up with detailed research and engineering studies, mainly because of expectations that emissions reductions could be undertaken rapidly enough to halt ongoing global warming (Crutzen, 2006). Discouraged by the lack of progress in international negotiations to limit greenhouse gas emissions, Wigley (2006) and Crutzen (2006) resurrected the call for geoengineering research Since their papers, a number of high-level review groups have called for increased research to determine the potential strengths and weaknesses of proposed approaches and to examine the ethical, governance, and other implications of conducting such research

Solar reduction scenarios
Temperature and precipitation responses to the reductions in solar radiation
Relative effectiveness of the alternative solar reduction extents
Findings
Discussion
Summary and next steps
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call