Abstract
The dominant understandings of ‘citizenship’ and ‘state sovereign authority’ unduly limit the range of solutions available to policy and law makers in their efforts to mitigate the negative impacts of climate-induced migration. The article offers a deterritorialized view of these concepts, which it suggests may be better suited to meet the full range of ethical and political challenges presented by climate change to international migration.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
