Climate Impacts of Making Evapotranspiration in the Community Land Model (CLM3) Consistent with the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB)

Abstract

Abstract In recent climate sensitivity experiments with the Community Climate System Model, version 3 (CCSM3), a wide range of studies have found that the Community Land Model, version 3 (CLM3), simulates mean global evapotranspiration with low contributions from transpiration (15%), and high contributions from soil and canopy evaporation (47% and 38%, respectively). This evapotranspiration partitioning is inconsistent with the consensus of other land surface models used in GCMs. To understand the high soil and canopy evaporation and the low transpiration observed in the CLM3, select individual components of the land surface parameterizations that control transpiration, canopy and soil evaporation, and soil hydrology are compared against the equivalent parameterizations used in the Simple Biosphere Model, versions 2 and 3 (SiB2 and SiB3), and against more recent developments with CLM. The findings of these investigations are used to develop new parameterizations for CLM3 that would reproduce the functional dynamics of land surface processes found in SiB and other alternative land surface parameterizations. Global climate sensitivity experiments are performed with the new land surface parameterizations to assess how the new SiB, consistent CLM land surface parameterizations, influence the surface energy balance, hydrology, and atmospheric fluxes in CLM3, and through that the larger-scale climate modeled in CCSM3. It is found that the new parameterizations enable CLM to simulate evapotranspiration partitioning consistently with the multimodel average of other land surface models used in GCMs, as evaluated by Dirmeyer et al. (2005). The changes in surface fluxes also resulted in a number of improvements in the simulation of precipitation and near-surface air temperature in CCSM3. The new model is fully coupled in the CCSM3 framework, allowing a wide range of climate modeling investigations without the surface hydrology issues found in the current CLM3 model. This provides a substantially more robust framework for performing climate modeling experiments investigating the influence of land cover change and surface hydrology in CLM and CCSM than the existing CLM3 parameterizations. The study also shows that changes in land surface hydrology have global scale impacts on model climatology.