Abstract

US national parks are challenged by climate and other forms of broad-scale environmental change that operate beyond administrative boundaries and in some instances are occurring at especially rapid rates. Here, we evaluate the climate change exposure of 289 natural resource parks administered by the US National Park Service (NPS), and ask which are presently (past 10 to 30 years) experiencing extreme (<5th percentile or >95th percentile) climates relative to their 1901–2012 historical range of variability (HRV). We consider parks in a landscape context (including surrounding 30 km) and evaluate both mean and inter-annual variation in 25 biologically relevant climate variables related to temperature, precipitation, frost and wet day frequencies, vapor pressure, cloud cover, and seasonality. We also consider sensitivity of findings to the moving time window of analysis (10, 20, and 30 year windows). Results show that parks are overwhelmingly at the extreme warm end of historical temperature distributions and this is true for several variables (e.g., annual mean temperature, minimum temperature of the coldest month, mean temperature of the warmest quarter). Precipitation and other moisture patterns are geographically more heterogeneous across parks and show greater variation among variables. Across climate variables, recent inter-annual variation is generally well within the range of variability observed since 1901. Moving window size has a measureable effect on these estimates, but parks with extreme climates also tend to exhibit low sensitivity to the time window of analysis. We highlight particular parks that illustrate different extremes and may facilitate understanding responses of park resources to ongoing climate change. We conclude with discussion of how results relate to anticipated future changes in climate, as well as how they can inform NPS and neighboring land management and planning in a new era of change.

Highlights

  • Recent scientific reviews of the US National Park Service (NPS) suggest the agency needs to manage its parks for changing climatic and ecological baselines in a landscape context [1,2,3]

  • Magnitudes and rates of modeled future climate change suggest that temperatures in many regions of the globe may shift outside the envelope of historical (1860– 2005) variability by mid-century [10], requiring desired future condition’ (DFC) to depart from past observations or records

  • Our analyses address three questions relevant to individual park management and NPS planning and policy: (i) relative to 1901–2012 historical range of variability’ (HRV), do recent climate conditions NPSwide tend to be unusually low or high on certain climate variables, (ii) how sensitive are these statistical distributions to the time window of analysis (10, 20, or 30 years), and (iii) which individual parks are climatically extreme relative to their HRV? We conclude with discussion of how results relate to anticipated future changes in climate and – by extension – how they may inform NPS climate adaptation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent scientific reviews of the US National Park Service (NPS) suggest the agency needs to manage its parks for changing climatic and ecological baselines in a landscape context [1,2,3]. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), globally each of the last three decades was increasingly warmer than any preceding decade since 1850, and – in the northern hemisphere –1983–2012 was possibly the warmest 30-year period of the last 1400 years [11] In these situations, DFC management confronts existing ‘retrospective’ management practices that have for decades worked to preserve areas and resources within an ‘historical range of variability’ (HRV) [12]. Due in part to logistical dilemmas posed by these possible futures, coupled with their novelty, there is often a desire to – where possible and as supported by current policy – manage under an existing, observed HRV, rather than an entirely new and uncertain set of conditions

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call