Abstract

Recent articles have investigated with integrated assessment models the possibility that climate damage bears on productivity (TFP) growth and not on production. Here, we compare the impact of these alternative representations of damage on the social cost of carbon (SCC). We ask whether damage on TFP growth leads to higher SCC than damage on production ceteris paribus. To make possible a controlled comparison, we introduce a measure of aggregate damage, or damage strength, based on welfare variations. With a simple climate-economy model, we compare three damage structures: quadratic damage on production, linear damage on growth and quadratic damage on growth. We show that when damage strength is the same, the ranking of SCC between a model with damage on production and a model with damage on TFP growth is not unequivocal. It depends on welfare parameters such as the utility discount rate or the elasticity of marginal social utility of consumption.

Highlights

  • The social cost of carbon 1 (SCC) the present social value of damage from an additional ton of CO2 released in the atmosphere is an important concept in environmental policy.It represents the price that should be put on greenhouse gases emissions to maximize welfare in a rst-best world

  • We found that the ranking of SCC between a model with damage on production and a model with damage on total factor productivity (TFP) growth is not unequivocal

  • Than quadratic damage on production, for the range of welfare parameters we considered; the comparison of quadratic damage on production and linear damage on growth depends on the welfare parameters

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The social cost of carbon 1 (SCC) the present social value of damage from an additional ton of CO2 released in the atmosphere is an important concept in environmental policy. It is the case in particular in the three models used in the Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon (2015): DICE (Nordhaus, 2010), FUND (Antho and Tol, 2013) and PAGE (Hope, 2013). Pindyck (2011, 2012) studied the eect of damage on growth for a measure of willingness to pay (WTP) to limit climate change to a given temperature increase, and found that WTP is lower than in the case of damage on production. He did not investigate the eect on the SCC. Temperature increase feedbacks on production (or on TFP growth) through damage

Economic module
Climate module
Damage structures
Scenarios under scrutiny
Measuring variations of welfare between scenarios
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call