Abstract

In this commentary we explore how international development, disaster relief and climate change mitigation credentials are being called upon to justify ‘crypto-colonialism’, whereby blockchain technology is used to extract economic benefits from those suffering the scars of colonial expansionism in the Global South. These benefits include land, labour and resources needed to facilitate local ‘crypto-utopian’ developments, or a ‘green economy’ elsewhere. As with past neoliberal development agendas imposing structural economic reforms, the contemporary crypto-colonial exercises discussed here are driven in pursuit of a common good – to protect the global commons and improve people’s lives. Within spaces where crypto-colonialism manifests, the governance frameworks of the associated technology is heavily entangled with social-spatial relations in multiple ways. We argue that despite being distributed, techno-ecological fixes are never placeless. How people engage with, resist or reconfigure a crypto-economy is geographically contingent. This commentary argues for more situated critical analysis of actually existing case-studies to reveal the inequitable terrain of project benefit distributions, and to expose the likely winners and losers within each. The success or failure of use-cases is less dependent on technical viability, but rather mediated through reactions to colonial contexts and historical experiences of various economic and climate crises.

Highlights

  • Peter Howson*Specialty section: This article was submitted to Blockchain for Good, a section of the journal Frontiers in Blockchain

  • Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions present unprecedented, and not evenly distributed, challenges for human development globally

  • The paper discusses three ways blockchain is implicated in colonial processes, exploring: (1) how the technology plays into ongoing narratives of “green grabbing,” enabling the liquidation of resources for green investment, (2) how blockchain impacts persistent North-South trade and investment inequalities, and (3) how a new power asymmetry is enabled by the technology through data colonialism and surveillance capitalism

Read more

Summary

Peter Howson*

Specialty section: This article was submitted to Blockchain for Good, a section of the journal Frontiers in Blockchain This commentary explores how climate crises are used to justify “crypto-colonialism,” whereby blockchain technology is used to extract economic benefits from those suffering the scars of historic colonial expansion in the Global South. These benefits include land, labor, data and other resources needed to facilitate capital interests elsewhere. Blockchain is implicated within crypto-colonialism in three ways It plays into ongoing narratives of “green grabbing,” where local claims to resources are liquidated for green investments.

INTRODUCTION
GREEN GRABS FOR CRYPTOCARBON
BLOCKCHAIN FOR CLEAN DEVELOPMENT
DATA COLONIALISM AND CLIMATE REFUGEES
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.