Abstract

The Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River are imposing barriers for wildlife, and the additive effect of urban and agricultural development that dominates the lower Great Lakes region likely further reduces functional connectivity for many terrestrial species. As the climate warms, species will need to track climate across these barriers. It is important therefore to investigate land cover and bioclimatic hypotheses that may explain the northward expansion of species through the Great Lakes. We investigated the functional connectivity of a vagile generalist, the bobcat, as a representative generalist forest species common to the region. We genotyped tissue samples collected across the region at 14 microsatellite loci and compared different landscape hypotheses that might explain the observed gene flow or functional connectivity. We found that the Great Lakes and the additive influence of forest stands with either low or high canopy cover and deep lake‐effect snow have disrupted gene flow, whereas intermediate forest cover has facilitated gene flow. Functional connectivity in southern Ontario is relatively low and was limited in part by the low amount of forest cover. Pathways across the Great Lakes were through the Niagara region and through the Lower Peninsula of Michigan over the Straits of Mackinac and the St. Marys River. These pathways are important routes for bobcat range expansion north of the Great Lakes and are also likely pathways that many other mobile habitat generalists must navigate to track the changing climate. The extent to which species can navigate these routes will be important for determining the future biodiversity of areas north of the Great Lakes.

Highlights

  • Climate is a dominant driver of species range expansion and contraction (Davis & Shaw, 2001; Huntley, 1999; Woodward & Williams, 1987); as a result, the warming climate will inevitably shift the range of many species (Bellard, Bertelsmeier, Leadley, Thuiller, &Courchamp, 2012; Thomas et al, 2004)

  • We originally hypothesized that gene flow percolated between the Great Lakes and deep snow areas but was hindered by low forest cover and by the transportation infrastructure

  • We found significant spatial structure where gene flow was constricted by the Great Lakes and areas with low and high forest cover with deep lake-effect snow impeded gene flow, while intermediate forest cover facilitated gene flow in the Great Lakes region

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Climate is a dominant driver of species range expansion and contraction (Davis & Shaw, 2001; Huntley, 1999; Woodward & Williams, 1987); as a result, the warming climate will inevitably shift the range of many species The additive influence of anthropogenic disturbance between and within the vicinity of the Great Lakes will likely further restrict gene flow through these large natural barriers for many species. Urban development and agricultural development dominate southern Ontario and may be impeding bobcats from colonizing this range frontier, over and above the barrier effect of the Great Lakes. We predicted that gene flow of the bobcat is obstructed naturally by the Great Lakes and deep snow and hindered by low forest cover and by the transportation infrastructure. This model most closely follows the isolation-by-resistance hypothesis (H2) previously described. Gene flow should be hindered by agricultural areas with low cover such as the corn belt areas of the Midwest and areas with high density of roads such as urban areas

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call