Abstract

Sovereign bonds – fixed-term loans from investors to governments with regular interest payments – are conventionally considered a safe form of investment. But a new class action filed in Australia, O’Donnell v Commonwealth, argues that even these investments will not be immune from the effects of climate change and that these risks ought to be disclosed to investors. This article examines the prospects of the case and its broader significance in advancing climate risk disclosure for investments. We argue that the O’Donnell case, building on existing trends in climate change litigation, has the potential to strengthen nascent jurisprudence on climate risk disclosure, while also extending that jurisprudence to the new field of investment in sovereign bonds.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.