Abstract

The Polar Regions chapter of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (SROCC) provides a comprehensive assessment of climate change impacts on polar marine ecosystems and associated consequences for humans. It also includes identification of confidence for major findings based on agreement across studies and weight of evidence. Sources of uncertainty, from the extent of available datasets, to resolution of projection models, to the complexity and understanding of underlying social-ecological linkages and dynamics, can influence confidence. Here we, marine ecosystem scientists all having experience as lead authors of IPCC reports, examine the evolution of confidence in observed and projected climate-linked changes in polar ecosystems since SROCC. Further synthesis of literature on polar marine ecosystems has been undertaken, especially within IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) Working Group II; for the Southern Ocean also the Marine Ecosystem Assessment for the Southern Ocean (MEASO). These publications incorporate new scientific findings that address some of the knowledge gaps identified in SROCC. While knowledge gaps have been narrowed, we still find that polar region assessments reflect pronounced geographical skewness in knowledge regarding the responses of marine life to changing climate and associated literature. There is also an imbalance in scientific focus; especially research in Antarctica is dominated by physical oceanography and cryosphere science with highly fragmented approaches and only short-term funding to ecology. There are clear indications that the scientific community has made substantial progress in its ability to project ecosystem responses to future climate change through the development of coupled biophysical models of the region facilitated by increased computer power allowing for improved resolution in space and time. Lastly, we point forward—providing recommendations for future advances for IPCC assessments.

Highlights

  • The Polar Regions chapter of the Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (SROCC) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides a broad overview and assessment of climate change impacts on polar marine ecosystems and associated consequences for humans (Meredith et al, 2019)

  • During the last International Polar Year several scientific collaborations were initiated, including Census of Antarctic Marine Life (CAML) and Integrating Climate and Ecosystem Dynamics in the Southern Ocean (ICED). These have demonstrated the importance of networking and coordination in ecological research initiatives; such as Integrated Ecosystem Assessments (Levin et al, 2014) that are in development for Arctic ecosystems (Bering, Chukchi, Greenland and Barents Seas) as well as the Southern Ocean (MEASO, 2020)

  • Greater Investment to Directly Assess Risks and Impacts of Climate Change on Polar Marine Ecosystems. While this is a well-worn statement in scientific literature, there is no doubt that much of the research to date used by the IPCC on the effects of climate change on polar marine ecosystems above biogeochemistry is opportunistic from outputs of other science programs

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The Polar Regions chapter of the Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (SROCC) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides a broad overview and assessment of climate change impacts on polar marine ecosystems and associated consequences for humans (Meredith et al, 2019). A remaining primary focus is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of approaches to reduce negative consequences and retain resilience, termed “adaptations.” Conclusions by Working Group 1 for AR6 (The physical science basis; IPCC, 2021) are consistent with earlier assessment reports that climate change is altering polar environments at unprecedented rates. These regions cannot be fully shielded from the effects of climate change through adaptation alone; adaption effectiveness is substantially enhanced by global carbon mitigation. We put forth recommendations for future advances for IPCC assessments

Data Gaps and Skewness in Data Coverage
Language Barriers
Projections of Ecosystem Responses
Ecosystem Process Error and Structural Uncertainty
Structural Error in Climate Models and Scenario Uncertainty
Ecosystem Resilience
Spatial Heterogeneity
Disciplinary Imbalance in Scientific Priorities
Policy Relevant Climate Assessments
ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call