Abstract
Abstract Climate change affects humanity in many ways, such as rising sea levels, water shortages, agricultural droughts, and the displacement of people. Thus, climate change threatens the enjoyment of human rights. States must therefore put in place effective mitigation and adaptation measures to combat climate change. But since no public budget can finance those transformation efforts, combatting climate change requires large sums of private capital. However, the international community has identified a multi-trillion dollar ‘climate investment gap’. Against this backdrop, the present contribution argues that international human rights obligations call on states to urgently redirect private investment flows into climate mitigation and adaptation measures. The existence of such an obligation and its impact on concrete policy decisions is then illustrated by three practical examples: the announced withdrawal of European states from the Energy Charter Treaty, Austria’s windfall tax on energy profits, and the US Inflation Reduction Act.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Austrian Review of International and European Law Online
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.