Abstract

ABSTRACTThe threat of climate change is emerging at a time of rapid growth for many economies in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Dominant narratives comprising ambitious development plans are common and often based around sectors with strong inter-dependencies that are highly exposed to climate variability. Using document analysis and key informant interviews, this article examines how climate change is addressed in policy, how it is being mainstreamed into water, energy and agriculture sector policies and the extent to which cross-sectoral linkages enable coordinated action. These questions are addressed through a case study of Tanzania, highlighting broader lessons for other developing countries, particularly those in SSA facing similar challenges. The article finds that, while the agriculture and water sectors are increasingly integrating climate change into policies and plans in Tanzania, practical coordination on adaptation remains relatively superficial. Publication of the Tanzania National Adaptation Plan of Action (NAPA) in 2007 marked a step change in the integration of climate change in sectoral policies and plans; however, it may have reinforced a sectoral approach to climate change. Examining the policies for coherence highlights overlaps and complementarities which lend themselves to a coordinated approach. Institutional constraints (particularly structures and resources) restrict opportunities for inter-sectoral action and thus collaboration is confined to ad hoc projects with mixed success to date. The results highlight the need for institutional frameworks that recognize and address these constraints to enable development goals to be pursued in a more sustainable and climate-resilient manner.KEY POLICY INSIGHTSThe NAPA has been successful at encouraging climate change mainstreaming into sectoral policies in Tanzania; however, the cross-sectoral collaboration crucial to implementing adaptation strategies remains limited due to institutional challenges such as power imbalances, budget constraints and an ingrained sectoral approach.Collaboration between nexus sectors in Tanzania is largely through ad hoc projects with limited progress on establishing deeper connections to enable collaboration as a process. Regular cross-sectoral planning meetings and consistent annual budgets could provide a platform to enhance cross-sectoral coordination.Plans to develop hydropower and agriculture are prevalent across sub-Saharan Africa. Insights from Tanzania highlight the importance of institutional and policy frameworks that enable cross-sectoral coordination.

Highlights

  • The threat of climate change is emerging at a time of rapid growth for many economies in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)

  • The water– energy–food (WEF) nexus framing draws on holistic, systems perspectives that recognize the value of coordinated approaches

  • Studies in policy coherence emphasize the value of policies that are coordinated across sectors so as to avoid maladaptation or conflicts between sectors (e.g. England et al, 2017)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The threat of climate change is emerging at a time of rapid growth for many economies in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Within the broader governance literature, key challenges of different sector viewpoints and responsibilities are highlighted and calls for a better understanding of interconnections are raised (Koop et al, 2017; Weitz, Strambo, Kemp-Benedict, & Nilsson, 2017) The WEF nexus addresses these key gaps by highlighting the need to consider the impacts of policies and actions in one sector on other, inter-related, sectors in order to account for synergies and trade-offs, improving efficiency and reducing the potential for negative sideeffects (Hussey & Pittock, 2012; Leck et al, 2015; Rasul & Sharma, 2016) This is an approach advocated by the post-2015 agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (Stockholm Environment Institute, 2014; Weitz, Nilsson, & Davis, 2014). Through the in-depth case study analysis, lessons are drawn for other developing SSA countries

Methods
Findings
Conclusions and policy implications
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.