Abstract

This article reviews climate change within the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 (SFDRR), analyzing how climate change is mentioned in the framework’s text and the potential implications for dealing with climate change within the context of disaster risk reduction. Three main categories are examined. First, climate change affecting disaster risk and disasters, demonstrating too much emphasis on the single hazard driver and diminisher of climate change. Second, cross-sectoral approaches, for which the SFDRR treads carefully, thereby unfortunately entrenching artificial differences and divisions, although appropriately offering plenty of support to other sectors from disaster risk reduction. Third, implementation, for which climate change plays a suitable role without being overbearing, but for which other hazard influencers should have been treated similarly. Overall, the mentions of climate change within the SFDRR put too much emphasis on the hazard part of disaster risk. Instead, within the context of the three global sustainable development processes that seek agreements in 2015, climate change could have been used to further support an all-vulnerabilities and all-resiliences approach. That could be achieved by placing climate change adaptation as one subset within disaster risk reduction and climate change mitigation as one subset within sustainable development.

Highlights

  • In 2015, three separate global sustainable development processes aimed for long-term agreements

  • Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 (SFDRR) mentions the phrase ‘‘climate change’’ 15 times in its 50 paragraphs, compared to the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015 (HFA) 2005-2015 (UNISDR 2005), which mentioned the phrase 13 times in 34 paragraphs. These basic numbers show that climate change is well-represented within the SFDRR and HFA, but it is not domineering and its relative influence might have diminished due to lower rate of appearances per paragraph in the SFDRR compared to the HFA

  • That repeats the same advantages of working within the current system and not being threatening to it, while repeating the same disadvantages of not being willing to move the system forward and do what is best for people on the ground, such as by placing climate change adaptation as one subset within disaster risk reduction (Kelman and Gaillard 2010; Kelman et al 2015) and climate change mitigation as one subset within sustainable development

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2015, three separate global sustainable development processes aimed for long-term agreements. The challenge is knowing whether the included acknowledgement, emphasis, and crossovers suffice to avoid problems, or whether more harm than good will be done by having three separate agreements— voluntary ones for disaster risk reduction and sustainable development and aiming for a legal one for climate change. To contribute to such analyses, this article reviews climate change within the SFDRR, analyzing how climate change is mentioned in the framework’s text and the potential implications for dealing with climate change within the context of disaster risk reduction.

Climate Change Influencing Disaster Risk
SFDRR Mentioning Climate Change
Climate Change Affecting Disaster Risk and Disasters
Cross-Sectoral Approaches
Implementation
Discussion
Concluding Comments
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call