Abstract

Assessing the drivers of survival across the annual cycle is important for understanding when and how population limitation occurs in migratory animals. Density-dependent population regulation can occur during breeding and nonbreeding periods, and large-scale climate cycles can also affect survival throughout the annual cycle via their effects on local weather and vegetation productivity. Most studies of survival use mark-recapture techniques to estimate apparent survival, but true survival rates remain obscured due to unknown rates of permanent emigration. This is especially problematic when assessing annual survival of migratory birds, whose movement between breeding attempts, or breeding dispersal, can be substantial. We used a multistate approach to examine drivers of annual survival and one component of breeding dispersal (habitat-specific movements) in a population of American redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla) over 11years in two adjacent habitat types. Annual survival displayed a curvilinear relation to the Southern Oscillation Index, with lower survival during La Niña and El Niño conditions. Although redstart density had no impact on survival, habitat-specific density influenced local movements between habitat types, with redstarts being less likely to disperse from their previous year's breeding habitat as density within that habitat increased. This finding was strongest in males and may be explained by conspecific attraction influencing settlement decisions. Survival was lowest in young males, but movement was highest in this group, indicating that apparent survival rates were likely biased low due to permanent emigration. Our findings demonstrate the utility of examining breeding dispersal in mark-recapture studies and complement recent work using spatially explicit models of dispersal probability to obtain greater accuracy in survival estimates.

Highlights

  • Given conservation concerns over recent and ongoing declines in many migratory bird populations (Sauer and Link 2011), a key research need is to determine the causes of population limitation and when they occur (Faaborg et al 2010)

  • Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

  • Of the 178 cases when an individual returned in a subsequent year, we were able to determine the approximate distance moved for 152 cases, including all 15 movements between habitat types and 137 movements within a habitat type (Fig. 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Given conservation concerns over recent and ongoing declines in many migratory bird populations (Sauer and Link 2011), a key research need is to determine the causes of population limitation and when they occur (Faaborg et al 2010). Limitation can be caused by conditions experienced during breeding, nonbreeding, or migratory phases of the annual cycle (Newton 2004), and events experienced during one phase can carry over to influence performance during subsequent phases (Marra et al 1998; Reudink et al 2009). Local weather patterns influence primary productivity (Lieth 1973) and insect abundance (Janzen and Schoener 1968), which in turn can affect the body condition of birds (Brown and Sherry 2006; Studds and Marra 2007) and their survival (Robinson et al 2007).

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.