Abstract

The Farm Security Administration (FSA) was the New Deal’s most sustained and successful effort to address chronic rural poverty in the United States, particularly through its program of rural rehabilitation. But at the time and since the effectiveness of rural rehabilitation has been overshadowed by the political fight over the FSA’s survival and the more ambitious (and controversial) resettlement program. Examined in terms of the practical goals of reducing rural poverty, rather than as a gauge for political and ideological trends, the FSA had decidedly modest results. Some of this can be attributed to the limitations and restrictions imposed by hostile political forces and a stingy Congress, but as this essay shows, much of the fault lay within the FSA, as it struggled to define goals and carry out anti-poverty programs for some of the poorest people in America.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.