Cleaner fish growth, welfare and survival in Atlantic salmon sea cages during an autumn-winter production

Lena Geitung,Daniel William Wright,Frode Oppedal,Lars Helge Stien,Tone Vågseth,Angelico Madaro

doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735623

Lena Geitung, Daniel William Wright + Show 4 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735623

Copy DOI

Abstract

Cleaner fish used as a biological control agent against salmon lice is rapidly increasing in Atlantic salmon aquaculture. However, concerns have been raised about the welfare and mortality of cleaner fish in salmon cage systems, which could in turn affect their performance in controlling salmon lice. In a 4-month autumn-winter study, we monitored growth, welfare, mortality and daytime depth distribution of the most commonly used cleaner fish, farmed ballan wrasse and lumpfish, in six salmon production sea cages where thermo- and haloclines were present. Ballan wrasse did not grow (SGR: small: −0.01% day−1, large: −0.06% day−1), while lumpfish significantly doubled in size (SGR: 0.87% day−1) during the study. High losses (registered mortality + unregistered loss) were observed in both species (57 and 27% of ballan wrasse and lumpfish, respectively). The welfare status of remaining individuals generally improved over the study period, regardless of species. Brief daytime camera observations at hides found ballan wrasse were typically deeper at warmer (median 12.4 °C) more saline (median 31.7 ppt) depths, where salmon were expected to reside during day periods, compared to lumpfish generally occupying colder (median 7.3 °C), brackish (median 18.9 ppt) water in surface layers. Considerable mortalities, minimal feeding (inferred from ceased growth) by ballan wrasse and a possible mismatch in lumpfish and salmon depths (inferred from limited daytime camera observations) suggest that cleaner fish may have low long-term effectiveness against salmon lice in stratified salmon sea cages over autumn-winter. Similar studies across seasons, locations and cage types (e.g. depth-based cage technologies) are vital to understand the extent of these issues in salmon aquaculture more broadly.

Highlights

The primary obstacle to production growth for the world's largest finfish mariculture industry, sea-cage Atlantic salmon Salmo salar farming (FAO, 2019), is the ectoparasitic salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis
Ballan wrasse stocking was immediately followed by a rise in mortalities, while lumpfish mortalities were largely absent until a spike in midJanuary or week 6 after deployment
Farmed cleaner fish are becoming the dominant species used as biological controls against salmon lice in the Atlantic salmon farming industry (Brooker et al, 2018b)

Summary

Introduction

The primary obstacle to production growth for the world's largest finfish mariculture industry, sea-cage Atlantic salmon Salmo salar farming (FAO, 2019), is the ectoparasitic salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis. Due to potential negative impacts on wild salmonid populations from farm-produced lice (Krkošek et al, 2011; Kristoffersen et al, 2018), the Norwegian government have enforced production volume limits and treatments when infestations exceed 0.5 adult females per fish (0.2 adult females during the out-migration of wild salmon, weeks 16–21) (Lovdata, 2012, 2017) This led the Norwegian industry to spend > 5 billion NOK (or €425 million at present currency exchange rates) in 2015 in attempts to control the parasite, with costs likely to have continued to rise since (Brooker et al, 2018a). Lice-eating cleaner fish on the other hand, have become widely accepted as a biological control of salmon lice due to a lack of negative effects on salmon welfare compared to chemical or physical delousing methods (Deady et al, 1995; Treasurer et al, 2002; Skiftesvik et al, 2013; Imsland et al, 2014a)

Methods

Results

Conclusion