Abstract
AbstractVarious adiabatic mixing schemes are explored using numerical simulations with the aim of finding suitable mixing sequences for fast rotating samples with relatively wide resonances and poorly resolved J‐couplings, such as proteins or resin‐bound products of solid‐phase synthesis. It is shown both experimentally and by simulations that WURST‐2 mixing scheme provides the best sensitivity and the lowest interference from cross‐relaxation effects in the spin diffusion limit. For medium‐sized molecules, WURST‐1, constant adiabaticity Gaussian and hyperbolic secant are the possible alternatives. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
