Abstract
We tackle the problem of reducing non-clausal MaxSAT and MinSAT to clausal MaxSAT and MinSAT. Our motivation is twofold: (i) the clausal form transformations used in SAT are unsound for MaxSAT and MinSAT, because they do not preserve the minimum or maximum number of unsatisfied clauses, and (ii) the state-of-the-art MaxSAT and MinSAT solvers require as input a multiset of clauses. The main contribution of this paper is the definition of three different cost-preserving transformations. Two transformations extend the usual equivalence preserving transformation used in SAT to MaxSAT and MinSAT. The third one extends the well-known Tseitin transformation. Furthermore, we report on an empirical comparison of the performance of the proposed transformations when solved with a state-of-the-art MaxSAT solver.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
