Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate outcomes in prostate cancer patients classified as high-risk (HR) or very high-risk (VHR) who were treated with conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).MethodsBetween 11/2001 and 3/2012, 203 patients with HR disease received CRT to the prostate (78–82 Gy) and pelvic lymph nodes (46–50 Gy) with ADT (6 m-2 years). Median follow-up was 50 months (12 m-142 m). Biochemical failure was defined according to Phoenix definition. Imaging studies were used to identify local, regional or metastatic failure. Four different VHR/HR groupings were formed using the 2014 and revised 2015 NCCN guidelines. Differences were examined using Kaplan Meier (KM) estimates with log rank test and uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis (MVA).ResultsFailure occurred in 30/203 patients (15%). Median time to failure was 30 m (4 m-76 m). KM estimate of 4 year biochemical disease free survival (b-DFS) for the entire cohort was 87% (95%CI: 82–92%). Four year KM survival estimates for b-DFS, PCSS and OS were comparable for each NCCN subgroup. On univariate analysis, the NCCN subgroups were not predictive of b-DFS at 4 years, however, DMFS was worse for both VHR subgroups (p = .03and .01) respectively. Cox univariate analysis was also significant for: PSA ≥40 ng/ml p = 0.001; clinical stages T2c p = .004, T3b p = .02 and > 4 cores with Gleason score 8–10 p < .03. On MVA, only PSA ≥ 40 ng/ml was predictive for b-DFS or MFS at 4 years (HR: 3.75 and 3.25, p < 0.005).ConclusionPatients with HR and VHR disease treated with CRT and ADT had good outcomes. Stratification into HR and VHR sub-groups provided no predictive value. Only PSA ≥40 ng/ml predicted poor outcomes on MVA. Distant failure was dominant and local recurrence rare, suggesting that improved systemic treatment rather than intensification of local therapy is needed.SummaryPatients with high-risk prostate cancer are most often treated with conformal dose escalated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation. Stratification into high versus very high-risk subgroups using 2014 or revised 2015 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria did not impact treatment outcomes. Only Prostate Serum Antigen (PSA) ≥40 ng/ml was predictive of poor prognosis. Distant failure was dominant and local recurrence uncommon which challenges the notion that intensification of local therapy will further improve outcomes in patients with high-risk disease.

Highlights

  • Physicians and patients, when asked about therapy for localized prostate cancer often look to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines to provide guidance for selection between different treatment options [1]

  • We reviewed treatment outcomes in a cohort of patients with HR disease treated with high dose conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to determine if local recurrence (LR) or metastatic disease was predominant

  • This study supports the assertion that patients with both HR and very high-risk (VHR) prostate cancer treated with high dose CRT, pelvic lymph node Radiation therapy (RT) (PLNRT) and ADT have favorable outcomes with low toxicity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Physicians and patients, when asked about therapy for localized prostate cancer often look to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines to provide guidance for selection between different treatment options [1]. Sundi et al defined a VHR group with adverse prognostic factors predictive for poor outcome following surgery and suggested the need for multimodal therapy to improve outcomes [4, 5] In consideration of these findings, the 2014 NCCN guidelines were revised and added the presence of primary Gleason grade 5 or ≥5 cores with Gleason score 8–10 as new criteria for inclusion into the VHR group [1]. Narang et al showed inferior outcomes in the VHR versus HR group in a cohort of patients treated with RT and ADT from 1993 through 2006 This retrospective study was limited by use of radiation techniques, treatment volumes, dose, and use of ADT that do not reflect current therapeutic approaches [6]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.