Abstract

Two studies were conducted to assess the consistency of classification of college students as depressed or not depressed. In the first study, classification of students at three depression levels (not depressed, mildly depressed, moderately depressed) was compared using Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores obtained on two occasions separated by either a 1-day or a 1-week interval. Whereas the overall test-retest reliability coefficients were acceptable, particularly when both administrations of the BDI occurred on the same day, the consistency of classification of subjects into the mild and moderate levels of depression was poor. In an attempt to determine the factors contributing to the poor classification consistency, a second study compared the effect of exposure to the BDI on subsequent BDI responses. Subjects who completed the BDI on two occasions showed significantly lower BDI scores compared to subjects exposed to an alternate depression inventory (the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale) or no prior questionnaire. In addition, a large percentage of subjects classified as moderately depressed following the initial BDI administration failed to be classified within the moderate categories on retesting the same day. Subjects tested using the Zung Depression Scale maintained the same depression classification when retested on the BDI. Item analyses failed to reveal significantly different amounts of change among individual BDI items.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.