Abstract
Classificatory reliability of the Carabelli trait was evaluated using randomly-selected study models and 52 unbiased observers. Benzécri's correspondence analysis showed Dahlberg's classification to be the most confidently applied. Observers showed less confidence in the application of individual class boundaries described by Goose and Lee; the methods of Alvesalo and Shapiro were the least confidently applied. Pair-wise Yates' chi-square tests on differences in left and right counts for each of the above methods indicated a significantly higher degree of antimeric classificatory consistency for the Dahlberg method.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
