Abstract
The classification of renal cortical tumours is problematic, with no clear division of benign from malignant tumours. Unbiased stereological estimates of volume-weighted nuclear volume (nuclear vv) were obtained by point sampling of nuclear intercepts in a retrospective study of 36 variably sized tubulo-papillary basophilic cell renal cortical tumours. There was no clear pattern of evolution of nuclear vv with increasing macroscopic tumour diameter. Estimates of nuclear vv could not distinguish between 21 tumours classified as renal adenomas with macroscopic diameters < 3 cm (average nuclear vv = 241 microns 3) and 15 tumours classified as renal cell carcinomas with diameters > 3 cm, or aggressive histological pattern (average nuclear vv = 229 microns 3) (2p = 0.68). In this subtype of renal cortical tumours, estimates of nuclear vv do not support the historical convention of using a 3 cm tumour diameter as the dividing line between adenomas and carcinomas, but support the theory of a single group of tumours. As most of the truly incidental renal cortical tumours are less than 1 cm in diameter, this limit could be considered. Such small benign cortical nodules have never been reported to metastasize, and would thus be excluded from being diagnosed and registered as malignant. Although this dividing line is again arbitrary, and cannot be justified by the stereological measurements, it is a practical solution to a clinical problem. There were too few examples of disease progression to assess the prognostic significance of nuclear vv in these tumours.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.