Abstract

BackgroundAn individual’s occupational activity (OA) may contribute significantly to daily physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB). However, there is little consensus about which occupational categories involve high OA or low OA, and the majority of categories are unclassifiable with current methods. The purpose of this study was to present population estimates of accelerometer-derived PA and SB variables for adults (n = 1112, 20–60 years) working the 40 occupational categories collected during the 2003–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).MethodsActiGraph accelerometer-derived total activity counts/day (TAC), activity counts/minute, and proportion of wear time spent in moderate-to-vigorous PA [MVPA], lifestyle, and light PA organized by occupational category were ranked in ascending order and SB was ranked in descending order. Summing the ranks of the six accelerometer-derived variables generated a summary score for each occupational category, which was re-ranked in ascending order. Higher rankings indicated higher levels of OA, lower rankings indicated lower levels of OA. Tertiles of the summary score were used to establish three mutually exclusive accelerometer-determined OA groupings: high OA, intermediate OA, and low OA.ResultsAccording to their summary score, ‘farm and nursery workers’ were classified as high OA and ‘secretaries, stenographers, and typists’ were classified as low OA. Consistent with previous research, some low OA occupational categories (e.g., ‘engineers, architects, and scientists’, ‘technicians and related support occupations’, ‘management related occupations’, ‘executives, administrators, and managers’, ‘protective services’, and ‘writers, artists, entertainers, and athletes’) associated with higher education and income had relatively greater amounts of MVPA compared to other low OA occupational categories, likely due to the greater percentage of men in those occupations and/or the influence of higher levels of leisure time PA. Men had more TAC, activity counts/minute and time in MVPA, but similar proportions of SB compared to women in all three OA groupings.ConclusionsObjectively measured PA allowed for a more precise estimate of the amount of PA and SB associated with different occupations and facilitated systematic classification of the 40 different occupational categories into three distinct OA groupings. This information provides new opportunities to explore the relationship between OA and health outcomes.

Highlights

  • An individual’s occupational activity (OA) may contribute significantly to daily physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB)

  • Compared to the analytical sample (n = 1112), those excluded from the study (n = 1792) were significantly younger, had lower wear time, accumulated significantly less activity counts/minute and total activity counts/day (TAC), spent a lower proportion of time in Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), lifestyle, and light, and more time sedentary, were more likely to have less than a high school education, to be non-Hispanic black, female, current smokers, single, and lower income (

  • In line with previous research, we showed that men were more active than women [37, 40, 50, 51] within the same OA groupings after adjusting for characteristics known to be related to PA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An individual’s occupational activity (OA) may contribute significantly to daily physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB). An individual can accumulate daily PA through occupational demands, transportation, household tasks, or engagement in leisure time PA (LTPA) [5, 6]. Many studies have shown high levels of OA to be associated with improved health, [7, 10,11,12,13] and the detrimental effects of large amounts of occupational sitting [14, 15]. Due to the substantial amount of time relegated to paid work in today’s society [20,21,22], an individual’s occupation likely has a strong influence on daily PA and sedentary behaviors (SB) (e.g., does their job require mostly sitting, standing, walking, engaging in repetitive tasks, or heavy labor) [23]. Including OA in addition to LTPA will allow a better understanding of the prevalence of daily PA, and inform interventions aimed to improve health, increase productivity, and reduce work-related injury of the employed population

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call