Abstract
Aristotle, Cicero, Quintilian, and Augustine define the means of persuasion and major styles of speaking and writing. Pseudo-Cicero’s Rhetorica ad Herennium and Quintilian’s Institutio oratoria classify numerous figures of speech. Using these categories, we analyze William Tyndale’s polemic, An Answere vnto Sir Thomas Mores Dialoge (1531). Under ethos, we trace the portrait of Tyndale. Under pathos, we examine the feelings supposedly evoked from More and from Little Flock. Under logos, we list Tyndale’s Reformation principles. Tyndale enhances the plain style with rhetorical questions, alliteration, and puns; the middle style with asyndeton; the grand style with personifications. Tyndale, the exiled biblical translator, is a voice crying in the wilderness.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
