Abstract
This study validated a Swedish translation of the Aging Semantic Differential Scale (ASD, 32-items) distributed online. Translation and back-translation were conducted. A convenience sample of nursing students completed the online questionnaire (N = 292) in spring 2020. Confirmatory factor analysis tested a validated four-factor structure consisting of 26 items, and the reliability and validity of the scale were tested. The Swedish version of the ASD was found to be reliable and valid. Model fit indices, internal reliability, and scale validity were acceptable. Construct validity was verified, and mean differences were observed, in accord with previous research regarding participants' age, sex, clinical experience, and personal relationships with older individuals. The findings provide cross-cultural validation of the ASD by extending its international use. The validation of an online version expands data collection flexibility. As this modified instrument required only 26 items, it may be beneficial for use in future studies and practical settings.
Highlights
The proportion of older people is predicted to continue to increase over time
Similar age-distribution proportions are currently observed in Sweden (Statistics Sweden, 2020a, 2020b)
Older people are often assumed to be dependent and a burden to society (Ayalon, 2019), exemplified in current public discourse surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic, with older individuals being blamed for societal restrictions by some individuals (Fraser et al, 2020)
Summary
The proportion of older people is predicted to continue to increase over time. Negative perceptions toward older individuals can translate into ageism and negative behaviors (Burnes et al, 2019), and there are several relationships between ageist perceptions and negative health outcomes affecting older people (Chang et al, 2020). By assessing perceptions toward older people, it may be possible to develop educational interventions targeting specific populations or domains of perceptions, and, in turn, reduce ageism (Burnes et al, 2019; Gallo, 2019). The questionnaire included questions about participants’ experiences of caring for persons 80 years and older (yes/no) and having family or relatives 80 years and older (yes/no). If participants did have family/relatives that were 80 years and older, they were asked to rate how much they felt they could share with them (1 1⁄4 all personal matters, 6 1⁄4 no personal matters).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
