Abstract
ObjectivesWe investigated the correlation between class II HLA epitope mismatch and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) episodes in kidney transplant recipients. In patients with AMR, epitope mismatch was also examined for each class II HLA mismatch to determine development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 167 kidney recipients. The numbers of eplet mismatches were compared between those with (n = 12) and without (n = 155) AMR, and the numbers of eplet mismatches for each type of mismatch in class II HLA among the AMR patients was also compared. ResultsTwelve AMR episodes were diagnosed. The total number of eplet mismatches in AMR patients with either HLA-DR or HLA-DQ was greater than those in non-AMR patients (P = .0085 and P = .0041, respectively), though the incidence of HLA class II (DRB1 + DQB) mismatch was not significantly different between the groups (P = .095). The rate of non-AMR status in patients with ≥15 was lower than those with <15 HLA class II (DR or DQ) eplet mismatches (P = .0299 and P = .0128, respectively). Twelve AMR patients had 30 HLA-DRB1/3/4/5 and 32 HLA-DQA/B mismatches. In both HLA-DR and -DQ, de novo DSAs developed against HLAs in association with a greater number of eplet mismatches (P = .0046 and P = .0044, respectively). ConclusionClass II HLA eplet mismatch is a risk factor for de novo DSA and AMR in kidney transplantation recipients. Furthermore, the number of HLA class II eplet mismatches has greater significance as a risk factor than the number of conventional HLA class II mismatches.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.