Abstract

This article reports the orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning carried out with a 14-year and 5-month-old female patient with esthetic and functional complaints. She presented an Angle Class I malocclusion, anterior crossbite and severe crowding in both maxillary and mandibular arches, in addition to a lightly concave straight facial profile. Orthodontic treatment did not require extraction. Crossbite was corrected by protrusion of upper teeth, which contributed to alignment and leveling of teeth, in addition to improving the patient's facial profile. The case was presented to the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (BBO) as a requirement for the BBO certification.

Highlights

  • This article reports the orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning carried out with a 14-year and 5-month-old female patient with esthetic and functional complaints

  • From a dental point of view, she presented Angle Class I malocclusion (Figs 1 and 2), her upper and lower canines were in end-to-end anteroposterior relationship

  • She presented severe crowding in the maxillary and mandibular arches, and anterior crossbite including #11 and #22

Read more

Summary

Class I malocclusion with anterior crossbite and severe crowding

This article reports the orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning carried out with a 14-year and 5-month-old female patient with esthetic and functional complaints She presented an Angle Class I malocclusion, anterior crossbite and severe crowding in both maxillary and mandibular arches, in addition to a lightly concave straight facial profile. Diagnosis The patient was an adolescent in the residual growth phase.[1] She presented an asymmetrical face, with proportional facial thirds and spontaneous lip seal (Fig 1) She avoided smiling and showing her teeth, which hindered the assessment of spontaneous smile and the amount of tooth exposure at smile. From a dental point of view, she presented Angle Class I malocclusion (Figs 1 and 2), her upper and lower canines were in end-to-end anteroposterior relationship She presented severe crowding in the maxillary and mandibular arches (maxillary discrepancy of -10 mm and mandibular discrepancy of -6 mm), and anterior crossbite including #11 and #22.

Ritter DE
RESULTS
Angle of convexity Axis Y
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.