Abstract

The main aim of this article is to present a comparative analysis of some synchronic morphological properties of Shona class 1 non-deverbal and deverbal nouns. On the surface, these nouns, like most other Bantu nouns, look superficially similar; they comprise a noun class prefix and a noun stem. However, this belies a huge diversity amongst these nouns. We demonstrate that class 1 non-deverbal and deverbal nouns display the following differences: first, the stems of non-deverbal nouns are monomorphemic whereas those of deverbal nouns are minimally bimorphemic and are derived from verb roots. Secondly, the boundaries between the class prefix and the nominal stem behave differently. To this end, we use vowel hiatus resolution as a diagnostic tool to demonstrate the differences. Third, in forming diminutives of non-deverbal nouns, there is substitution of prefixes whereas for the deverbal nouns there is stacking of prefixes. We demonstrate that deverbal and non-deverbal nouns behave differently with respect to their phonology and derivational properties. We conclude that nouns in class 1 are not uniform and a theory of noun classes needs to be rich enough to account for the diversity. This research contributes towards the description and analysis of Shona nominal morphology in particular, and Bantu Linguistics in general.

Highlights

  • One of the principal identifying characteristics of the Bantu language family is the system used to classify nouns – the noun class system

  • This article presented a comparative analysis of the morphophological properties of deverbal and non-deverbal nouns in Shona noun class 1

  • We have demonstrated that vocalic hiatus resolution is a useful diagnostic tool in demonstrating http://spilplus.journals.ac.za the differences between non-deverbal and deverbal nouns

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the principal identifying characteristics of the Bantu language family is the system used to classify nouns – the noun class system (cf. Bleek 1862, Meinhof 1932, Guthrie 1948). If we compare the structure, behaviour and distribution of the deverbal nouns vis-à-vis non-deverbal nouns (“inherent nouns”) of class 1, there are significant differences. Following Mudzingwa (2010) and Mudzingwa and Kadenge (2011), we use hiatus resolution strategies as a diagnostic tool to establish the differences between the boundaries of deverbal and non-deverbal nouns that fall in class 1. Mindful of such observations, this article compares the morphological and morphophonological properties of non-deverbal and deverbal nouns of class 1, in an attempt to obtain a deeper understanding of the Shona nominal system in particular, and Bantu languages in general

Brief overview of the morphology of the Shona noun system
The noun class prefix
The noun stem
The non-deverbal noun
Deverbal nouns
The verb structure
Verb Root
Derivational Stem
Inflected Verb Stem
Structure of deverbal nouns
Deverbal and non-deverbal boundary differences
Diminutives
Class 21
Singular-plural contrast
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call