Abstract
In his response to the colleagues' critique, Lipovetsky emphasizes the discursive (as opposed to political and/or ideological) character of the intelligentsia community, shaped by the ITR discourse. Developing ideas generated by the discussion and revisiting the trope of "progressor", he introduces a hypothesis of this discursive formation as a version of "internal colonization" (Alexander Etkind). In this capacity, this discourse has obtained a central position in late Soviet culture and, having undergone the transformation, preserved its significance, now predominantly conservative, for post-Soviet culture. В своем ответе на отзывы коллег Марк Липовецкий подчеркивает дискурсивный (а не политический или идеологический) характер интеллигентского сообщества, образованного ИТР-дискурсом. Отталкиваясь от высказанных в дискуссии суждений и развивая троп "прогрессора", он высказывает гипотезу об ИТР-дискурсе как варианте "внутренней колонизации" (А. Эткинд). Именно в этом качестве ИТР-дискурс приобрел одну из центральных позиций в поздней советской культуре и, трансформировавшись, сохранил теперь все более консервативное значение для постсоветской культуры.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
