Clarification of vehicle cone index with reference to mean maximum pressure

Abstract

The US Army developed Vehicle Cone Index (VCI) as a metric for directly quantifying the ability of vehicles to traverse soft-soil terrain. In order to ensure minimum soft-soil performance capabilities for their new military vehicles, the US Army has used VCI for many years as a performance specification. The United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defence (UK MOD) has used the Mean Maximum Pressure (MMP) parameter for many years as a performance specification. It has been demonstrated that the MMP parameter relates to soft-soil performance capabilities, and hence, the UK MOD has ensured minimum performance capabilities for their new military vehicles by using MMP specifications. Both the VCI and MMP specification approaches have served their users well, but fundamental differences in the two specification approaches have produced some misunderstandings concerning what VCI really is and how it relates to MMP. This article clarifies that VCI is a performance metric, not a set of predictive equations, explains how VCI is measured, and compares different methods of predicting VCI for one-pass performance (i.e., VCI 1) of wheeled vehicles in fat clay soils. It is further clarified that MMP should not be compared with VCI but instead with Mobility Index (MI), which is the principal parameter used by the US Army for predicting VCI. Relationships are presented for using MMP to predict VCI 1 for wheeled vehicles in clay, and the resulting relationships allow comparison between MMP and MI in terms of their ability to predict VCI. Seventy-nine VCI 1 performance measurements were used for the comparison, and they demonstrate that MI describes the historical performance data somewhat better than MMP.