Claims of Forgotten Trauma

Abstract

Background: A review of the literature was made concerning repressed memory phenomena and recovered memory therapy, and data from six psychiatric case histories were examined specifically with regard to repressed memory phenomena. The ramifications of repressed memory phenomena were examined regarding cultural origins and legal consequences, the role of the therapists in such cases, and the effects of repressed memory claims on the patients. Methods: A discussion of the literature regarding repressed memory phenomena and their cultural significance and legal applications precedes an examination of six cases involving repressed memory claims—three clinical psychiatric case histories and three forensic psychiatric case histories. Each case was evaluated with regard to its ultimate forensic resolution and/or its psychological impact on the patients and their families. Results: Repressed memory claims have gained cultural ascendancy during the last decade and have proliferated within the legal system, beginning with the late 1980s. Claims of repressed memory phenomena and methods of recovered memory therapy at the present time have shown little regard for substantiated proof or sound critical thinking in the pursuit of assigning blame for a wide array of adult mental illnesses and disorders. Conclusions: A method must be developed as a standard for repressed memory cases that will preserve the best interests of the patient and the integrity of the therapist's treatment plan. Recommendations are made for safeguarding the well-being of the patient and for defining the objective and credible role of the therapist in repressed memory cases.