Abstract
Although historians have for some time been integrating sociological concepts into their work on eugenics, sociologists have for the most part left the study of late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century eugenics to historians. Arguing that our understanding of eugenics can be advanced by combining sociological and historical methods, this paper undertakes a constructionist analysis of the first U.S. eugenics campaign, which redefined poor, feeble-minded women as carriers of “depraved” heredity and resulted in establishment of the first U.S. prophylactic institution. The author merges original research and the results of previous historical investigations with social problems theory to answer three questions about this “discovery” campaign: (1) How did it construct feeble-minded women as a eugenic threat? (2) Why did it (in contrast to other eugenic crusades) concentrate exclusively on women? and (3) Why was it successful?
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
