Abstract

The bottom-up or informal placemaking process is “illegal”, practised only by the “poor” and “unintellectual” classes. The author argues that various classes practise informal placemaking regardless of their economic status or educational level. Studying the spatial manifestation of informal placemaking helps to understand the concrete needs of the residents and reconsider their role in identifying places. Aiming to comprehend informal placemaking and its importance, this study investigates informal placemaking in Sheraton Residence, Heliopolis, Cairo. The area is chosen for its formality, socio-economic and cultural patterns. Cases of informal placemaking in Sheraton Residence are described and analysed to pinpoint their role in creating a sense of place, territorial identity and comprehending their meaning. A comparison with cases in informal low-income housing is conducted to construct diversities and similarities. The study encourages the re-thinking of the public role in placemaking as a place of negotiation and belonging. We can improve their urban quality by re-thinking informal placemaking and looking at how people use the place. The general impression that only informal housing and low-educated classes practise informal placemaking is incorrect.

Highlights

  • Sims considers Cairo out of control; people might ignore the Egyptian building regulations and exercise informal urbanism [1]

  • This study investigates typical informal placemaking cases in Sheraton Residence, Heliopolis, Cairo

  • Informal placemaking in Sheraton Residence and El-Arab showed similarity on the conceptual level and diversity in application

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sims considers Cairo out of control; people might ignore the Egyptian building regulations and exercise informal urbanism [1]. When the local authorities neglect their urban duties, various community classes are forced to create their place [2, p. By analysing the spatial relation of significant cases, the study analyses how informal placemaking generates places of territorial belonging, negotiation and identity. As space transforms into place according to a whole range of users actions and activities [12], such transformation is created due to users' decisions to facilitate their place belonging and attachment [13]. The term informal placemaking is used in this study to indicate uncharted, unregistered or “illegal” urban activities practised by individuals or influential parties. Neglecting informal placemaking is unhelpful since individual behavioural choices are essential to promoting environmental sustainability It should be considered a silent protest and urban reflection of individuals creating a sense of place [15, p. The right to the city should include collaboration, deliberation and place control [20]; bottom-up placemaking should not be overlooked

Informal Placemaking in Sheraton Residence
Informal Placemaking in El-Arab Housing
Identity of Informal Placemaking
Flexibility and Informal Placemaking
Similarities in Informal Placemaking
Diversities of Informal Placemaking in Cairo
Informal Placemaking and the Urban Power
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call