Abstract

Recent scholarship on American Indian literatures has shifted away from emphasizing the theoretical relationship between oral traditions and writing toward a greater focus on sovereignty. If sovereignty is one’s concern, there are worthwhile reasons not to get caught up in tired questions of oral traditions and writing. But what if oral-written dynamics can bear importance for the sovereignty turn in American Indian literary studies after all? I explore this possibility by taking a new look at a key series of essays by N. Scott Momaday. By analyzing Momaday’s commentaries on the traditional Kiowa story of the arrowmaker, we can see a way of re-exploring the relation between oral traditions and writing that affirms, rather than erodes, Indian sovereignty. For Momaday, the arrow-maker serves to undo Western thought’s subordination of oral traditions to written literature, ultimately reestablishing oral traditions rather than writing as the primal source of literariness.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call